Sorry avid reader(s?), I'm afraid life and work (particularly work) have recently gotten in the way of my weekly blogging. I'm suspending things until the new year, when efforts will be redoubled.
Best of the holidays to you and yours.
Ryan
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
Trouble on the Homefront, Method to the Madness
HOME ICE (DIS)ADVANTAGE?
The Oilers are mediocre at home, and were pretty decent on their recent long road trip, leading one to wonder... what the hell is wrong with playing at home? I've seen this type of play before from Oiler teams in the past: trying to be too cute, make the pretty play, one-man deke-fests with the end result being a lack of goals. This is what we saw last night. They are averaging nearly a goal-a-game less this season at home (2.0 GPG) vs. on the road (2.8 GPG). Troubling to say the least. It would be nice to see some crisp passing, simple dump-and-chase and puck support a bit more often. There is something to be said for the simple play. If the effort is there, and the simple play keeps the puck in the o-zone, then I guarantee we will start seeing more red lights. Doesn't hurt to try, does it?
Still on the same topic, if Gagner makes one more cute, soft drop pass on the rush I will revoke my fanboy membership.
MACTAVISH THE MAD SCIENTIST
Does anyone else get the feeling that Craig MacTavish has method to some of the recent madness we've been seeing in him? Pisani at center, Smid on the wing, Cole on the left side, Gagner on the PK, calling out Penner, constant line shuffling, etc... at a cursory glance it's a bloody madhouse he's running! Some bloggers are calling this the end-of-days for MacT, and that might be the case. Another scenario might be that he is on a very long leash this year, with the focus on developing, training and feeling out his players.
That is the only logical solution that I can see here, as this coach isn't stupid. Playing guys in odd situations may have an end design to it, as he might be trying to develop these guys into the well-rounded players that he covets. Take Smid on the wing as an example. One could argue that playing Smid here gives him some more range to skate freely and hit, and develop some offensive awareness. To be honest, Smid has looked very solid of late on the back end, and maybe it's his offense that the coach wants to develop quicker. Maybe the coach sees promise in him. Maybe he's not in the doghouse at all. Just maybe.
TOMMY BOY'S BLOG
Has anyone else been reading Tom Gilbert's blog at all? If you haven't, it's worth it for a chuckle or two. Essentially he writes like his audience is 12 year old girls, discussing most recently about going to see High School Musical 3 (apparently not as good as the first two)! Didn't this guy go to college?
The Oilers are mediocre at home, and were pretty decent on their recent long road trip, leading one to wonder... what the hell is wrong with playing at home? I've seen this type of play before from Oiler teams in the past: trying to be too cute, make the pretty play, one-man deke-fests with the end result being a lack of goals. This is what we saw last night. They are averaging nearly a goal-a-game less this season at home (2.0 GPG) vs. on the road (2.8 GPG). Troubling to say the least. It would be nice to see some crisp passing, simple dump-and-chase and puck support a bit more often. There is something to be said for the simple play. If the effort is there, and the simple play keeps the puck in the o-zone, then I guarantee we will start seeing more red lights. Doesn't hurt to try, does it?
Still on the same topic, if Gagner makes one more cute, soft drop pass on the rush I will revoke my fanboy membership.
MACTAVISH THE MAD SCIENTIST
Does anyone else get the feeling that Craig MacTavish has method to some of the recent madness we've been seeing in him? Pisani at center, Smid on the wing, Cole on the left side, Gagner on the PK, calling out Penner, constant line shuffling, etc... at a cursory glance it's a bloody madhouse he's running! Some bloggers are calling this the end-of-days for MacT, and that might be the case. Another scenario might be that he is on a very long leash this year, with the focus on developing, training and feeling out his players.
That is the only logical solution that I can see here, as this coach isn't stupid. Playing guys in odd situations may have an end design to it, as he might be trying to develop these guys into the well-rounded players that he covets. Take Smid on the wing as an example. One could argue that playing Smid here gives him some more range to skate freely and hit, and develop some offensive awareness. To be honest, Smid has looked very solid of late on the back end, and maybe it's his offense that the coach wants to develop quicker. Maybe the coach sees promise in him. Maybe he's not in the doghouse at all. Just maybe.
TOMMY BOY'S BLOG
Has anyone else been reading Tom Gilbert's blog at all? If you haven't, it's worth it for a chuckle or two. Essentially he writes like his audience is 12 year old girls, discussing most recently about going to see High School Musical 3 (apparently not as good as the first two)! Didn't this guy go to college?
Thursday, November 20, 2008
Random Notes
ROTTEN, ROTTEN SCHEDULE:
Can you believe what the Oil have to put up with schedule-wise this year? Long early road trip aside, it certainly doesn't make much sense to have to play a home-and-home Monday-Thursday with the defending champs and stick us with a game in Columbus on Tues night, all while the Wings are sipping Mai Tais on the beach and towel-snapping cabana boys on a two-day break. (Okay, maybe maybe beers in the pub with a barkeep, but I like to pretend that Pavel Datsuyk is cracking a wet towel at beach walk-bys!) Jeez that was random... okay, anyhow: The Schedule. It makes no sense. Unless you start subscribing to some of the conspiracy talk about Bettman and the head office having it in for the Oil. And that isn't that hard to believe after seeing this purtid stank of a sked. Why did we have to play Columbus Tuesday, with five days off after Thurs?
Believe me, I don't like whine anymore than you do, and this may seem like a bit of a rant, but I think there is a valid point here. And that is: We are getting screwed.
PENNER SITS 2, COMES BACK ANGRY:
Watching Penner play Tuesday night against Columbus after sitting in the PB for two made me think of this familiar scene (modified for our scenario) from a favorite movie:
Craig Mactavish: "You gotta get angry! You gotta get meeeeeeeeean!"
Dustin Penner: "I guess I'm not really an angry person."
MacT: (Punches Penner in the groin) "Are you angry now?"
I hope the Dustin Penner we saw Tuesday is the same DP who shows up for the rest of the season, as he was doing what we hoped he would do: forecheck agressively, give and take some hits, take a beatdown in front of the net on the PP, score, etc. If he reverts back to lazy Dustin, and he probably will, then that will spell trouble for the coaching staff. Calling out Dustin on his poor play was the right move from MacTavish - if that is what it takes to get through to him - but it means that MacT has left himself exposed.
Hell, I don't profess to understand the inner workings of the Oiler organization, but with the recent changes to ownership and GM it makes one wonder who is calling what shots now. Three goalies and plucking goons off waivers must have Craig punching pillows at night.
SHELDON IS A STUD:
And no, I don't mean he's dreamy. I mean: This guy can play. We all knew he had a shot, but he has stepped up and carried us on his shoulders. A few wins can be directly attributed to his standout play, and he looks steadier in the D-zone than I originally thought. By far the best D-man, and seems to relish the added responsibility of more ice time and the "A" on his sweater. Did you see the way he gave Penner a look and a shot to the arm after the PP goal in the third last game? Penner took a beating in front of the net for the screen, and big Sheldon's man-love seemed to say, "Way to go, big guy!"
I would love to see this guy wear the "C" one day.
Thursday, November 13, 2008
How the bloody hell does THIS make things better?
ANOTHER ENFORCER?
The Oilers announced yesterday that they have
claimed goon Jesse Boulerice off waivers from the Avalanche. The same guy who wasn't allowed back in the OHL for this, and who was suspended for 25 games last year for this. Boulerice is a brutal hockey player (see stats), and not even a very good fighter. This is terrible news if the Oilers plan to keep him, and I don't stand alone on this opinion (viewing comments made on other blogs here, here, etc). I would really prefer if this guy doesn't put on an Oiler jersey.I really hope that this is more of a stratigic play than a hockey move - as the Oil play the Avs Saturday night, and perhaps they weren't looking forward to playing AGAINST stick-weilding Jesse. One can hope he stays in the PB and is waived on Sunday.
THE THIRD HEAD SAYS, "LOOK AT ME!"
Jeff Droulin-Deslauriers (of the Oilers Three-headed goalie monster) has played the previous 2.5 games for the Oil, and he has looked good. Scary good. Confident with a big calm presence, he has most fans excited about his future. He is outplaying his past numbers (AHL, ECHL) by a long shot, so don't expect this to continue for much longer. But I'll revel in it while it lasts.
His play also muddies the goalie picture, with the two vets on the last year of their respective contracts, and Garon likely looking to resign. What should the Oil do? Trade a vet goalie? Send down JDD and risk waivers? I say stand pat. The goalie situation will "play" itself out in time, and we can trade months from now when the playoff picture is closer and the value is (hopefully) higher.
WITH THE REVOLVING DOOR OF LINEMATES, HEMSKY GETS CONFUSED AND CONTINUES SCORING INSTEAD OF PASSING
Thank god the Fernando experiment is over. Pisani at center was not the best idea MacT has ever tried (I seem to remember Smyth was involved in a similar failed experiment). I'm also glad to see the kid line split, and the distribution of talent over four lines. With Stortini in and the enforcer-of-the-day out, we can roll 4 solid lines and gain momentum.
Also, I am a big fan of the Horcoff-Pisani-Cole line. Beauty "second" line who can play against anyone. Love it.
Friday, October 31, 2008
G9 Nashville Recap: Gilbert Struggles Continue, Grebeshkov Deserved Better?
As was pointed out to me, I may have been a bit harsh on Grebeshkov with the 4/10 grade on the night (see below). I do agree with Mr. Staples that he was not at fault for at least 2 of the 3 goals, even though he was on the ice for all three goals against. He is paired with a struggling partner in Tom Gilbert, who IMHO should sit for a couple once Strudwick is back. (I would rather have Smid out there any day over Gilbert if he doesn't shape up.) Grebs is for the most part playing well positionally, and some of his bad play may be attributed to 77. However, he is a skilled puck mover and we have all seen him wheel and deal in the past, so when his outlet passes are mostly ineffective, leading to turnovers, and he is unable to move the play forward I feel obligated to grade accordingly. It may just be a confidence thing. Last year he improved vastly with decision-making - ie. knowing when to pinch, sneak down from the point, puck distribution in transition - he looked like a stud by the end of the year to me. As I say below for Hemsky, there is something to be said for the struggling player who realizes that what he is doing isn't working, and adjusts/simplifies his game accordingly. Hell, if we had 3 pairs of Smid/Souray I would be one happy guy.
That said, the grading is obviously a very objective exercise. We all see things from different perspectives, and we pick up on the various aspects of the game differently. Here's my grades:
Mark Sheet for Game 9 - Nashville:
Sheldon Souray, 7. This guy stepped up and was by far the best Oiler on the ice tonight. Solid presence in front of the Oilers net, blocked 3 shots, had more than a few nice pinches along the boards to keep the play alive, got 5 shots through to the net and scored the only goal for the good guys. This guy was a force at both ends and really settled things down and took over.
Shawn Horcoff, 7. Had at least four nice scoring chances in the the game - finding the open ice and getting shots on net. Was solid in the faceoff circle, and in particular on defensive zone faceoffs. Had a couple good sticks/takeaways. Would've been an 8 if he had scored.
Ladislav Smid, 6. Played a really solid defensive game. Good physical play, 5 hits, and smart, simple plays out of the d-zone.
Mathieu Garon, 6. Deserved better tonight. Let in three goals, but really only had a chance on one of them. Made some big saves to keep them in it down 2-1, and an excellent cross-crease save on a Preds powerplay to keep it close.
Lubomir Visnovsky, 6. Good defensive game. Was steady in own end, and made more than a few good outlet passes. A good percentage of offensive rushes started off of his stick tonight. However, he took at least seven shots and could not find the net. Had what seemed like an eon to skate in wide open and blast an easy save for Rinne in the first.
Fernando Pisani, 6. This guy plays such a complete game night in and night out. He played well defensively on the backcheck, had a few good rushes with Moreau and Cole and played well on the penalty kill. Was awful in the faceoff circle though.
Ethan Moreau, 6. Good speed on rush, good physical play to generate chances, good on the penalty kill. Almost batted the puck into his own net with an ugly baseball swing though.
Marc Pouliot, 6. Limited ice time, but made things happen on the rush. Created a couple good cycles down low with scoring chances, had a nice rush with Stortini, and created his own chance out of nothing by taking a shot and bulling his way to the net for his own rebound.
Sam Gagner, 6. Cycled down low well, a few nice moves with the puck to open up the ice. At times seemed lost on the breakout, as he had about 7 different linemates on the night.
Steve Staios, 5. Solid D-man plays a low risk, steady game. Nothing too noticeable tonight.
Erik Cole, 5. Carried good speed and tough play into offensive zone. Created a nice play and almost scored on a breakaway early in the first. Played like a horse with the blinders on. Seemed to slow as the game went on, and had a couple bad passes and a terrible giveaway in the third.
Dustin Penner, 5. Played well in front of the net on the PP with good screening on the Souray goal. Appeared slow at times and didn't seem to play well with Cogliano and Gagner. A few good cycles and work along the boards died with his inability to keep the play alive.
Ales Hemsky, 5. Made a few beauty skill plays, and a couple nice passes on the PP, but was for the most part ineffective tonight. I know that he can generate something out of nothing by dancing through everyone on the ice now and again, but 9 times out of 10 tonight Nashville shut him down in transition or along the boards. There is something to be said for recognising when to make the simple effective play (ie. dump into the corners and go get it!). Hemsky seemed unwilling to adjust tonight. Without the assist he would have been a 4.
Kyle Brodziak, 5. Had a few good rushes with Pouliot and Stortini. Played well on the penalty kill and was decent in the faceoff circle going 4 for 6.
Zack Stortini, 5. See Brodziak above - a few good crash and bang rushes and created a good scoring opportunity for Pouliot in the first. Nothing special though, and no big hits or rough stuff.
Andrew Cogliano, 5. Good board work down low behind the net with Gagner, but was mostly invisible. Had a couple turnovers at the Preds blueline.
Robert Nilsson, 5. Played with speed in the first, generated a couple nice plays with Hemsky. Was invisible in the 2nd and was dropped back down to the 2nd line in the third.
Denis Grebeshkov, 4. Made a couple nice passes/plays in the offensive zone to create scoring chances in the first. Was ineffective with Gilbert on the powerplay, and struggled in transition. Was on the ice for all three goals against.
Tom Gilbert, 3. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh here, but he seems to be getting worse as the season progresses. He looks lost and was completely ineffective on the powerplay, and was -3 on the night. Made poor choices with outlet passes, and besides a couple decent panic plays was pretty much awful. Flubbed passes, ineffective on the rush, ahhhh! How many times is too many to yell at the TV, "C'mon Gilbert, get it together!"
Well that's how I saw it anyways. If you saw it differently or would like to discuss further, leave a comment and we can discuss.
That said, the grading is obviously a very objective exercise. We all see things from different perspectives, and we pick up on the various aspects of the game differently. Here's my grades:
Mark Sheet for Game 9 - Nashville:
Sheldon Souray, 7. This guy stepped up and was by far the best Oiler on the ice tonight. Solid presence in front of the Oilers net, blocked 3 shots, had more than a few nice pinches along the boards to keep the play alive, got 5 shots through to the net and scored the only goal for the good guys. This guy was a force at both ends and really settled things down and took over.Shawn Horcoff, 7. Had at least four nice scoring chances in the the game - finding the open ice and getting shots on net. Was solid in the faceoff circle, and in particular on defensive zone faceoffs. Had a couple good sticks/takeaways. Would've been an 8 if he had scored.
Ladislav Smid, 6. Played a really solid defensive game. Good physical play, 5 hits, and smart, simple plays out of the d-zone.
Mathieu Garon, 6. Deserved better tonight. Let in three goals, but really only had a chance on one of them. Made some big saves to keep them in it down 2-1, and an excellent cross-crease save on a Preds powerplay to keep it close.
Lubomir Visnovsky, 6. Good defensive game. Was steady in own end, and made more than a few good outlet passes. A good percentage of offensive rushes started off of his stick tonight. However, he took at least seven shots and could not find the net. Had what seemed like an eon to skate in wide open and blast an easy save for Rinne in the first.
Fernando Pisani, 6. This guy plays such a complete game night in and night out. He played well defensively on the backcheck, had a few good rushes with Moreau and Cole and played well on the penalty kill. Was awful in the faceoff circle though.
Ethan Moreau, 6. Good speed on rush, good physical play to generate chances, good on the penalty kill. Almost batted the puck into his own net with an ugly baseball swing though.
Marc Pouliot, 6. Limited ice time, but made things happen on the rush. Created a couple good cycles down low with scoring chances, had a nice rush with Stortini, and created his own chance out of nothing by taking a shot and bulling his way to the net for his own rebound.
Sam Gagner, 6. Cycled down low well, a few nice moves with the puck to open up the ice. At times seemed lost on the breakout, as he had about 7 different linemates on the night.
Steve Staios, 5. Solid D-man plays a low risk, steady game. Nothing too noticeable tonight.
Erik Cole, 5. Carried good speed and tough play into offensive zone. Created a nice play and almost scored on a breakaway early in the first. Played like a horse with the blinders on. Seemed to slow as the game went on, and had a couple bad passes and a terrible giveaway in the third.
Dustin Penner, 5. Played well in front of the net on the PP with good screening on the Souray goal. Appeared slow at times and didn't seem to play well with Cogliano and Gagner. A few good cycles and work along the boards died with his inability to keep the play alive.
Ales Hemsky, 5. Made a few beauty skill plays, and a couple nice passes on the PP, but was for the most part ineffective tonight. I know that he can generate something out of nothing by dancing through everyone on the ice now and again, but 9 times out of 10 tonight Nashville shut him down in transition or along the boards. There is something to be said for recognising when to make the simple effective play (ie. dump into the corners and go get it!). Hemsky seemed unwilling to adjust tonight. Without the assist he would have been a 4.
Kyle Brodziak, 5. Had a few good rushes with Pouliot and Stortini. Played well on the penalty kill and was decent in the faceoff circle going 4 for 6.
Zack Stortini, 5. See Brodziak above - a few good crash and bang rushes and created a good scoring opportunity for Pouliot in the first. Nothing special though, and no big hits or rough stuff.
Andrew Cogliano, 5. Good board work down low behind the net with Gagner, but was mostly invisible. Had a couple turnovers at the Preds blueline.
Robert Nilsson, 5. Played with speed in the first, generated a couple nice plays with Hemsky. Was invisible in the 2nd and was dropped back down to the 2nd line in the third.
Denis Grebeshkov, 4. Made a couple nice passes/plays in the offensive zone to create scoring chances in the first. Was ineffective with Gilbert on the powerplay, and struggled in transition. Was on the ice for all three goals against.
Tom Gilbert, 3. Maybe I'm being a bit harsh here, but he seems to be getting worse as the season progresses. He looks lost and was completely ineffective on the powerplay, and was -3 on the night. Made poor choices with outlet passes, and besides a couple decent panic plays was pretty much awful. Flubbed passes, ineffective on the rush, ahhhh! How many times is too many to yell at the TV, "C'mon Gilbert, get it together!"
Well that's how I saw it anyways. If you saw it differently or would like to discuss further, leave a comment and we can discuss.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Okay, back to basics people!
Allright, I'm back! Well ok, I was never really gone... but it sure felt like it. Too busy at work and home to post, and that is just inexcusable. Time must be made! This is important stuff!
Well here are my recent thoughts on the Oil...
Back to Basics:
The game Monday night against the Bruins was certainly an improvement over the previous... oh say 4-5 games, as the Oilers didn't tank the first 30mins (only the first 8 or so), played decent defensively (Souray, Grebs, and Smid in particular), and had a stellar game from Roly. The negatives were that they were much too "cute" with the puck, caused more turnovers than created, and frequently seemed out of synch with each other in transition. All cause for concern.
MacT spared no one Tuesday, by casting out a blanket "Get your shit together" to the entire team, stressing that hard-nosed play and simplification is the answer. I certainly hope that he lit a fire under these guys. They need something to get them going.
The Enforcer Experiment:
I personally am fed up with the two-headed, pine-riding/PB-watching Stortini-MacIntyre trial. This, in my opinion, is killing the 4th line option for MacT - as he can't "roll four" and gain some momentum to the game. Brodziak looks lost out there with a different guy beside him on almost every shift. I for one would love to see a solid winger night-in and night-out playing with Brodziak and Pouliot. A speedy crash-bang line to compliment the Moreau-Pisani-Cole line is just what the doctor ordered. IF that is Stortini, then so be it. I think Brule or Potulny could also fill this roll, GlenX style. Why not try it?
SMac is a great guy and a good story. I just don't see a need for him. He had one good game against Calgary (sorry, one good SHIFT) where he crunched a Flame and beat down another. But any Oiler could have thrown a big hit that night to get the team going. It doesn't have to be a 2min/game monster who does it! Where is Ethan, the CAPITAN for Christ sake, for this stuff? Last year it was our crash-bang 4th line that got the team going most nights. IMHO, this is what is missing up front. Oh yeah, and a little something called SCORING.
Goofy Gilbert?:
What the hell happened to Tom Gilbert? His play has been mediocre to downright awful this year. Hell, he's making the Jeff Finger signing look good! Did he play too much Guitar Hero over the summer and forget how to play hockey? And settle down and make a pass? Or how about just "boards-and-out" Tom? Friggen hell.
Making the Grade:
David Staples has come up with an excellent idea to track and rate the team (each individual) per game. It is a basic system of grading each player on a scale of 1 to 10 based on their performance. See the grading system here. Oilers fans, along with David, are grading each game this season, with the results posted on his blog, "Cult of Hockey".
I am helping out Mr. Staples a bit on this, and have already graded Game 4 (vs Flames). Tonight I will also grade the Nashville game. I'll post my grades/thoughts here as well from now on. GOILERS!
Well here are my recent thoughts on the Oil...
Back to Basics:
The game Monday night against the Bruins was certainly an improvement over the previous... oh say 4-5 games, as the Oilers didn't tank the first 30mins (only the first 8 or so), played decent defensively (Souray, Grebs, and Smid in particular), and had a stellar game from Roly. The negatives were that they were much too "cute" with the puck, caused more turnovers than created, and frequently seemed out of synch with each other in transition. All cause for concern.
MacT spared no one Tuesday, by casting out a blanket "Get your shit together" to the entire team, stressing that hard-nosed play and simplification is the answer. I certainly hope that he lit a fire under these guys. They need something to get them going.
The Enforcer Experiment:
I personally am fed up with the two-headed, pine-riding/PB-watching Stortini-MacIntyre trial. This, in my opinion, is killing the 4th line option for MacT - as he can't "roll four" and gain some momentum to the game. Brodziak looks lost out there with a different guy beside him on almost every shift. I for one would love to see a solid winger night-in and night-out playing with Brodziak and Pouliot. A speedy crash-bang line to compliment the Moreau-Pisani-Cole line is just what the doctor ordered. IF that is Stortini, then so be it. I think Brule or Potulny could also fill this roll, GlenX style. Why not try it?
SMac is a great guy and a good story. I just don't see a need for him. He had one good game against Calgary (sorry, one good SHIFT) where he crunched a Flame and beat down another. But any Oiler could have thrown a big hit that night to get the team going. It doesn't have to be a 2min/game monster who does it! Where is Ethan, the CAPITAN for Christ sake, for this stuff? Last year it was our crash-bang 4th line that got the team going most nights. IMHO, this is what is missing up front. Oh yeah, and a little something called SCORING.
Goofy Gilbert?:
What the hell happened to Tom Gilbert? His play has been mediocre to downright awful this year. Hell, he's making the Jeff Finger signing look good! Did he play too much Guitar Hero over the summer and forget how to play hockey? And settle down and make a pass? Or how about just "boards-and-out" Tom? Friggen hell.
Making the Grade:
David Staples has come up with an excellent idea to track and rate the team (each individual) per game. It is a basic system of grading each player on a scale of 1 to 10 based on their performance. See the grading system here. Oilers fans, along with David, are grading each game this season, with the results posted on his blog, "Cult of Hockey".
I am helping out Mr. Staples a bit on this, and have already graded Game 4 (vs Flames). Tonight I will also grade the Nashville game. I'll post my grades/thoughts here as well from now on. GOILERS!
Friday, September 26, 2008
Preseason Thoughts - Forwards on the Cusp
Slava T
rukhno!
Can this guy play or what! Good skill set, a bit suspect on the skating, great shot, backchecks... I really like this guy. I think he would greatly benefit from big minutes in the A, and looks like a good injury callup. Plus the guys are calling him Trucker!
Gilbert Brule:
Love this guy. Smart hockey player, good skill set, not afraid of the corners, fast. Has shown decent faceoff skills in the past, and looks like a good fit for a 3rd or 4th line role. Would love to see him on a line with Brodziak... could maybe fill the Glencross shoes? He seemed a bit selfish with the puck in the last preseason game... trying to do too much and impress probably... but I'm sure MacT could settle him down. With a defined role, I think he will be a big upgrade on Torres.
MA Pouliot:
I've been a fan of this dude for a while... and it feels like I've been waiting for him to break out in the bigs for years now. He'll show a flash or two of excellence... generally makes the right play, and looks good in a bottom 6 role. Then he'll stall out, have a bad period, make junior-level mistakes - the guy is fustrating me to no end! Three years ago I would have told you that he would be centering a stellar checking line that could put the puck in the net. If you ask me, this will be Poo's last 'Cup-o-coffee' for the Oil if he doesn't pull it together.
Ryan Potulny:
Who? Doesn't ring a bell... Seriously, has anyone noticed this guy in preseason yet? Invisible! Apparently a solid 2-way player, but haven't seen him do much of anything. Not ready for the show.
Rob Schremp:
Whooo boy, where do I start? Ok. This guy has an amazing set of hands. Fantastic skills with the puck. HOWEVER, he lacks at two-way play, is afraid of the tough areas on the ice, and doesn't have the footspeed to keep up with Gagner or Hemmer. IMO, he would be wasted on a 4th line, PP specialist role. Plus, we already have at least three skilled forwards who can set up on the half boards on the PP (Gagner, Hemsky, Nilsson, etc). Don't get me wrong, I like 'Sugartits', but there isn't a spot on the roster for him. I say we keep him up, give him some playtime, and ship him outta dodge for a 3C faceoff defensive specialist (see Nichol post below).
rukhno!Can this guy play or what! Good skill set, a bit suspect on the skating, great shot, backchecks... I really like this guy. I think he would greatly benefit from big minutes in the A, and looks like a good injury callup. Plus the guys are calling him Trucker!
Gilbert Brule:
Love this guy. Smart hockey player, good skill set, not afraid of the corners, fast. Has shown decent faceoff skills in the past, and looks like a good fit for a 3rd or 4th line role. Would love to see him on a line with Brodziak... could maybe fill the Glencross shoes? He seemed a bit selfish with the puck in the last preseason game... trying to do too much and impress probably... but I'm sure MacT could settle him down. With a defined role, I think he will be a big upgrade on Torres.MA Pouliot:
I've been a fan of this dude for a while... and it feels like I've been waiting for him to break out in the bigs for years now. He'll show a flash or two of excellence... generally makes the right play, and looks good in a bottom 6 role. Then he'll stall out, have a bad period, make junior-level mistakes - the guy is fustrating me to no end! Three years ago I would have told you that he would be centering a stellar checking line that could put the puck in the net. If you ask me, this will be Poo's last 'Cup-o-coffee' for the Oil if he doesn't pull it together.
Ryan Potulny:
Who? Doesn't ring a bell... Seriously, has anyone noticed this guy in preseason yet? Invisible! Apparently a solid 2-way player, but haven't seen him do much of anything. Not ready for the show.Rob Schremp:
Whooo boy, where do I start? Ok. This guy has an amazing set of hands. Fantastic skills with the puck. HOWEVER, he lacks at two-way play, is afraid of the tough areas on the ice, and doesn't have the footspeed to keep up with Gagner or Hemmer. IMO, he would be wasted on a 4th line, PP specialist role. Plus, we already have at least three skilled forwards who can set up on the half boards on the PP (Gagner, Hemsky, Nilsson, etc). Don't get me wrong, I like 'Sugartits', but there isn't a spot on the roster for him. I say we keep him up, give him some playtime, and ship him outta dodge for a 3C faceoff defensive specialist (see Nichol post below).Friday, September 12, 2008
Enough 'Silly' talk! What do you think about a Stanley Nichol?
I've noticed recently on a couple of the Oiler blogs that others also think the Oilers are lacking in a solid defensive 3rd line righty centerman - with good faceoff skills. Like a Draper. Oh I'm sure everyone would love to have a Draper, wouldn't they? Good luck stealing him away from the Wings!
Anyway, I've noticed that some would like to see Mike 'Silly' Sillinger make his way over to the Oilers. I too was looking pretty hard at Sillinger - I think he would be a good fit for now - but are we trying to plug a temporary hole here? Sillinger is not a "piece of the puzzle" in my opinion. At 37 and on the decline is more of a stopgap. And as that may be a good fit while Cogliano and Brodziak develop, I myself have always been a Puzzle kind-of-guy.
The player that I've really been impressed the last couple of seasons with is Scott Nichol from Nashville. Good solid player defensively, pk, top righty faceoff guy, and at 33 he still has some good years ahead of him. Would love to see this guy in copper and blue. Maybe a rich-man's Reasoner?
His defensive numbers from last year were pretty good:
- Faceoffs: 60% (441 won for 738 tot);
- Plus/Minus: +12
...and his +/- On Ice per 60 mins VS +/- Off Ice per 60 mins looked even better, at 0.71 vs 0.12. (See Desjardins Behindthenet for detailed excellent stats).
I see us giving up a goalie and/or some young skill / prospects. Nashville is lacking in proven goalies (Their top two have less than 50 big league games between them) and just lost Radulov to Russia. Maybe a Schremp or a Roly is something Nashville could use right now, as they have no shortage of established centers (Arnott, Legwand, Bonk, Fiddler).
Anyway, I've noticed that some would like to see Mike 'Silly' Sillinger make his way over to the Oilers. I too was looking pretty hard at Sillinger - I think he would be a good fit for now - but are we trying to plug a temporary hole here? Sillinger is not a "piece of the puzzle" in my opinion. At 37 and on the decline is more of a stopgap. And as that may be a good fit while Cogliano and Brodziak develop, I myself have always been a Puzzle kind-of-guy.
The player that I've really been impressed the last couple of seasons with is Scott Nichol from Nashville. Good solid player defensively, pk, top righty faceoff guy, and at 33 he still has some good years ahead of him. Would love to see this guy in copper and blue. Maybe a rich-man's Reasoner?His defensive numbers from last year were pretty good:
- Faceoffs: 60% (441 won for 738 tot);
- Plus/Minus: +12
...and his +/- On Ice per 60 mins VS +/- Off Ice per 60 mins looked even better, at 0.71 vs 0.12. (See Desjardins Behindthenet for detailed excellent stats).
I see us giving up a goalie and/or some young skill / prospects. Nashville is lacking in proven goalies (Their top two have less than 50 big league games between them) and just lost Radulov to Russia. Maybe a Schremp or a Roly is something Nashville could use right now, as they have no shortage of established centers (Arnott, Legwand, Bonk, Fiddler).
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
I'm trying, I really am...
Why-oh-why is this blogging thing so hard to keep up with? I'll tell you why dammit, cause I started a friggen hockey blog in the middle of this beauty summer! Not the brightest idea, but one that I'd like to keep the car running on until the hockey actually starts up. THEN you'd better watch your ass, 'cause they'll be so many bloody posts you'll be a-spinnin'.
Riiiight.
Okay, so todays hot hockey topic is, ahhh.... uh... lemme see... lets run through some here...
"Oilers Capitan Moreau passenger in hit and run" - Wha? Oh yes. Very lame. Ethan and his chachi buddies are out for shooters at a posh Vancity club... hit a PARKED CAR while backing out of the parking stall, set off some car alarms, then took off. WTF?
No? Feeling dumber? Join the club.
Lets try another:
"Horcoff to Habs for Plekanec trade rumour" - Wow. Some Habs fans just won't let this one go.
This rumoured trade makes ZERO sense. They JUST signed Horc to big dollas for six yrs. It would be at best a lateral move for the Oil... and what kind of message does that send to other players (ie. Garon, Cole) who are thinking about long-term deals?
Who makes this crap up? Seriously. Ok, one more before my brain explodes:
"Khabibulin to LA for a pick and a prospect" - I've seen this one floating around for at least a month now. Chicago brought in Huet as the new #1 this summer, and they are now about $2.5mil over the cap. The Builn Wall is in his last year of a pricey deal: $6.75mil / yr cap hit.
The Kings on the other hand are well below the salary cap floor (~ $10mil +) and need to do some signing/spending/trading in the next 4 weeks. Also, they are lacking in the "quality proven goalies" department. It would seem to be the perfect fit, so I'm not sure why this one is stalled out. Maybe LA has their eyes on a bigger prize? Or isn't willing to fork over some future just to make the cap. Not sure why Lombardi didn't just offer big bucks to Huet on July 1 in the first place. Would have saved him a whole lot of headache now!
Well, that's about all I can come up with. Relevant Oilers news is hard to find this time of year. Hell, ANY hockey news is hard to find. Just be happy that I'm not talking about Mats again!
TTFN suckas.
Riiiight.
Okay, so todays hot hockey topic is, ahhh.... uh... lemme see... lets run through some here...
"Oilers Capitan Moreau passenger in hit and run" - Wha? Oh yes. Very lame. Ethan and his chachi buddies are out for shooters at a posh Vancity club... hit a PARKED CAR while backing out of the parking stall, set off some car alarms, then took off. WTF?
No? Feeling dumber? Join the club.
Lets try another:
"Horcoff to Habs for Plekanec trade rumour" - Wow. Some Habs fans just won't let this one go.This rumoured trade makes ZERO sense. They JUST signed Horc to big dollas for six yrs. It would be at best a lateral move for the Oil... and what kind of message does that send to other players (ie. Garon, Cole) who are thinking about long-term deals?
Who makes this crap up? Seriously. Ok, one more before my brain explodes:
"Khabibulin to LA for a pick and a prospect" - I've seen this one floating around for at least a month now. Chicago brought in Huet as the new #1 this summer, and they are now about $2.5mil over the cap. The Builn Wall is in his last year of a pricey deal: $6.75mil / yr cap hit.The Kings on the other hand are well below the salary cap floor (~ $10mil +) and need to do some signing/spending/trading in the next 4 weeks. Also, they are lacking in the "quality proven goalies" department. It would seem to be the perfect fit, so I'm not sure why this one is stalled out. Maybe LA has their eyes on a bigger prize? Or isn't willing to fork over some future just to make the cap. Not sure why Lombardi didn't just offer big bucks to Huet on July 1 in the first place. Would have saved him a whole lot of headache now!
Well, that's about all I can come up with. Relevant Oilers news is hard to find this time of year. Hell, ANY hockey news is hard to find. Just be happy that I'm not talking about Mats again!
TTFN suckas.
Friday, August 15, 2008
Summer Slackin Already...
Yup I know avid reader(s?), I've tortured you by providing 0.0% new informational content for a whole week now. You must be numb from waiting! I must say, I'm so sorry. How on Earth can I ever make it up to you? Huh? Wha? What's that you say? Timmy's in the well? AGAIN? Goddamn it Timmy, you keep this up and we'll call the next one of your accidents "natural selection". Lassie needs her sleep you know.
Oops, went a little off the deep end there. Ok back to reality people.
I'd like to kick things off on this glorious Friday by lecturing all of the old, indecisive potential NHL retirees: SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT, YOU WANKERS! Yes, I'm talking to YOU Mr. Sundin, Mr. Sakic, Mr. Shannahan, and anyone else that I've forgotten.
Mats is killing me with this "will he, won't he" crap, so lets consider Mats Sundin for a moment here. He refused to be traded at the deadline (for a chance to win a cup) and stayed true blue. When I heard this, I thought to myself, "this guy must bleed maple syrup he's so bloody loyal". Either that or his chip shot needed some practice before hitting the links. Now summer's here, and he says that he's considering retiring, as well as considering offers from the Leafs and OTHERS. Well... what the hell.
Just for kicks, lets take a look at your options here Mats:
1. Retire: If he's done, well then ok. He's done. But if the guy has waited this long, lets be honest - he still has that urge suckerpunch Sean Avery or to pancake... well... ANYBODY into the boards one more time. (Can you blame him?) He knows that he still has some very good hockey left in him, and if you still enjoy it then I say: play while you can buddy. Also, as one of the greatest Leafs of all time he hasn't had a proper send-off... and to retire now would be lame. Very lame.
2. Sign with the (Insert other team name here): Leaf fans would want to lynch the guy if he does this. First he denies them some decent players/prospects/picks by refusing to be traded at the deadline (stating team loyalty as a reason), and now he signs elsewhere as a free agent? So much for your legacy as a Leaf, Mats. Not really the way a premier player should end his long career with a franchise! He'd go from beloved to beheaded pretty damn quick I'm guessing.
3. Sign with the Maple Leafs: I can only think that the reason he hasn't done this yet is that he is waiting to see what the hell Fletcher still has left to tinker/trade/screwup before summers over. If he wants to still play hockey I see this as his only realistic option (see above).
Anyhoo. Thats how stretched I am for relevant hockey talk today. The Mats Sundin Saga. Friggin Hell.
Oops, went a little off the deep end there. Ok back to reality people.
I'd like to kick things off on this glorious Friday by lecturing all of the old, indecisive potential NHL retirees: SHIT OR GET OFF THE POT, YOU WANKERS! Yes, I'm talking to YOU Mr. Sundin, Mr. Sakic, Mr. Shannahan, and anyone else that I've forgotten.
Mats is killing me with this "will he, won't he" crap, so lets consider Mats Sundin for a moment here. He refused to be traded at the deadline (for a chance to win a cup) and stayed true blue. When I heard this, I thought to myself, "this guy must bleed maple syrup he's so bloody loyal". Either that or his chip shot needed some practice before hitting the links. Now summer's here, and he says that he's considering retiring, as well as considering offers from the Leafs and OTHERS. Well... what the hell.
Just for kicks, lets take a look at your options here Mats:
1. Retire: If he's done, well then ok. He's done. But if the guy has waited this long, lets be honest - he still has that urge suckerpunch Sean Avery or to pancake... well... ANYBODY into the boards one more time. (Can you blame him?) He knows that he still has some very good hockey left in him, and if you still enjoy it then I say: play while you can buddy. Also, as one of the greatest Leafs of all time he hasn't had a proper send-off... and to retire now would be lame. Very lame.
2. Sign with the (Insert other team name here): Leaf fans would want to lynch the guy if he does this. First he denies them some decent players/prospects/picks by refusing to be traded at the deadline (stating team loyalty as a reason), and now he signs elsewhere as a free agent? So much for your legacy as a Leaf, Mats. Not really the way a premier player should end his long career with a franchise! He'd go from beloved to beheaded pretty damn quick I'm guessing.
3. Sign with the Maple Leafs: I can only think that the reason he hasn't done this yet is that he is waiting to see what the hell Fletcher still has left to tinker/trade/screwup before summers over. If he wants to still play hockey I see this as his only realistic option (see above).
Anyhoo. Thats how stretched I am for relevant hockey talk today. The Mats Sundin Saga. Friggin Hell.
Friday, August 8, 2008
Fall Lineups!
I realize that it's still summer, but I haven't been this excited about an Oilers team and their upcoming season since we had Weight and Cujo. I know, its a bit sad. Strangely, I was never that enthralled when KLowe brought in Pronger three summers ago (in fact I've always had a hate-on for the guy dating back to his draft year with the Petes - although his contributions in '06 were outstanding, especially playoffs). This year promises to be one of speed and skill, with a couple of surprises coming out of camp as well.
I've put a lot of thought into lines lately. There are a number of factors/circumstances that will affect and change what happens, but it is still fun to play coach for a day. Here is the lineup as I see it:
Forwards:
Cole - Horcoff - Hemsky
Penner - Gagner - Nilsson
Cogliano - Brodziak - Brule/Stortini
Moreau - Pouliot - Pisani
Adds = Schremp, Potulny, Reddox
I see Penner in on the 2nd line for a couple of reasons. He provides a big presence down low and along the boards for the young skill, he can put the puck in the net, and most importantly he provides good faceoff support (and I actually see him taking 2/3 of them over Gagner). The Oilers have no shortage of Centers this year, but are (for the first time in a long while) looking very mediocre in the faceoff circle. Penner had the best faceoff numbers last year of returning players (55%, 189 FOs). Horcoff is solid at 52%, but took close to 1000 last year and I don't see him being able to take more than 1500. The departure of Stoll and Reasoner has left a large void for faceoffs that I can't see any of the kids stepping up and making up for this (other than Brodziak - a respectable 52% on 189 FOs last yr). Gagner: 42% on 299 FOs (one of the worst in the league last yr); Cogliano: 40% on 542 FOs (just awful); Pouliot: 48% and unproven; Brule: 52% on 78 FOs (small sample size). I'm not saying that MacT won't keep the kid line together for some situations, but I see a weakness on that line that MacT is bound to try to fix. This is just one of the possibilities, but probably most likely - as it allows Penner to have some top six time.
I see Liam Reddox pulling into the lineup occasionally if he has a good camp, as the coaching staff really has a hard on for him. Schremp is due for a tryout, and Brule may surprise at camp making things tough. MacT may have to juggle a few in and out for a while to see what fits best, and this likely means that only 2 goalies stay long-term. JDD through waivers, or trade Roly. It's going to be an interesting start!
Defence:
Souray - Visnovsky
Grebeshkov - Gilbert
Smid - Staios
Adds = Roy, Strudwick
I see Staios possibly moving up with Visnovsky, as he may provide better d support that big Sheldon. Smid and Souray may work, and MacT might play around with this a bit. Super Steve will see more minutes than this lets on, as he is the go-to guy for defensive situations, but I like him with Smid as I think they have decent chemistry and Smid could probably use the mentor beside him. Visnovsky will insist on the right side, especially on the PP. One of the most solid d-corps the Oil have started the season with in a while tho.
Goal:
Garon
Roloson
Droulin-Deslauriers
I see Roly stepping up to start the season and playing well. Probably a 60-40 split with Garon until one of them gets hurt. JDD is unproven and might be a bit shaky, although you never know with goalies. I suspect he will pass through waivers mid October unfazed, and remain in Springfield until one of the big boys is injured/traded. I can't see them hanging on to three goalies for long, as I think MacT will want the extra seat in the PB for a young forward (Potulny, Reddox, Brule etc). The other option is sign Garon and trade Roly and a kid (Pouliot? JFJ?) for a solid vet.
PP Unit 1:
Penner - Horcoff - Hemsky
Souray - Visnovsky
PP Unit 2:
Cole - Gagner - Nilsson/Cogliano/Schremp
Grebeshkov - Gilbert
I see a lot of shuffling/tinkering with the lineups here - particularly the second unit with the young skill. Cole and Penner may change places, and the RW is a crapshoot. Expect a tryout period. Visnovsky's numbers should increase from last year with his right side position back - this was his biggest complaint from last season. Breaking up Souray and Visnovsky might be a good idea as well... although it would seem a waste to put Souray's shot on the second unit.
PK Unit 1:
Horcoff - Moreau
Souray - Gilbert
PK Unit 2:
Brodziak - Cogliano
Grebeshkov - Staios
This is where we will suffer on d-zone faceoffs. Things really drop off below Horc. I see Brodziak stepping up in Nov-Dec and showing us decent faceoff numbers. Brule may slip in on the 2nd unit here as well - if he stays up with the team, that is.
I've put a lot of thought into lines lately. There are a number of factors/circumstances that will affect and change what happens, but it is still fun to play coach for a day. Here is the lineup as I see it:
Forwards:
Cole - Horcoff - Hemsky
Penner - Gagner - Nilsson
Cogliano - Brodziak - Brule/Stortini
Moreau - Pouliot - Pisani
Adds = Schremp, Potulny, Reddox
I see Penner in on the 2nd line for a couple of reasons. He provides a big presence down low and along the boards for the young skill, he can put the puck in the net, and most importantly he provides good faceoff support (and I actually see him taking 2/3 of them over Gagner). The Oilers have no shortage of Centers this year, but are (for the first time in a long while) looking very mediocre in the faceoff circle. Penner had the best faceoff numbers last year of returning players (55%, 189 FOs). Horcoff is solid at 52%, but took close to 1000 last year and I don't see him being able to take more than 1500. The departure of Stoll and Reasoner has left a large void for faceoffs that I can't see any of the kids stepping up and making up for this (other than Brodziak - a respectable 52% on 189 FOs last yr). Gagner: 42% on 299 FOs (one of the worst in the league last yr); Cogliano: 40% on 542 FOs (just awful); Pouliot: 48% and unproven; Brule: 52% on 78 FOs (small sample size). I'm not saying that MacT won't keep the kid line together for some situations, but I see a weakness on that line that MacT is bound to try to fix. This is just one of the possibilities, but probably most likely - as it allows Penner to have some top six time.
I see Liam Reddox pulling into the lineup occasionally if he has a good camp, as the coaching staff really has a hard on for him. Schremp is due for a tryout, and Brule may surprise at camp making things tough. MacT may have to juggle a few in and out for a while to see what fits best, and this likely means that only 2 goalies stay long-term. JDD through waivers, or trade Roly. It's going to be an interesting start!
Defence:
Souray - Visnovsky
Grebeshkov - Gilbert
Smid - Staios
Adds = Roy, Strudwick
I see Staios possibly moving up with Visnovsky, as he may provide better d support that big Sheldon. Smid and Souray may work, and MacT might play around with this a bit. Super Steve will see more minutes than this lets on, as he is the go-to guy for defensive situations, but I like him with Smid as I think they have decent chemistry and Smid could probably use the mentor beside him. Visnovsky will insist on the right side, especially on the PP. One of the most solid d-corps the Oil have started the season with in a while tho.
Goal:
Garon
Roloson
Droulin-Deslauriers
I see Roly stepping up to start the season and playing well. Probably a 60-40 split with Garon until one of them gets hurt. JDD is unproven and might be a bit shaky, although you never know with goalies. I suspect he will pass through waivers mid October unfazed, and remain in Springfield until one of the big boys is injured/traded. I can't see them hanging on to three goalies for long, as I think MacT will want the extra seat in the PB for a young forward (Potulny, Reddox, Brule etc). The other option is sign Garon and trade Roly and a kid (Pouliot? JFJ?) for a solid vet.
PP Unit 1:
Penner - Horcoff - Hemsky
Souray - Visnovsky
PP Unit 2:
Cole - Gagner - Nilsson/Cogliano/Schremp
Grebeshkov - Gilbert
I see a lot of shuffling/tinkering with the lineups here - particularly the second unit with the young skill. Cole and Penner may change places, and the RW is a crapshoot. Expect a tryout period. Visnovsky's numbers should increase from last year with his right side position back - this was his biggest complaint from last season. Breaking up Souray and Visnovsky might be a good idea as well... although it would seem a waste to put Souray's shot on the second unit.
PK Unit 1:
Horcoff - Moreau
Souray - Gilbert
PK Unit 2:
Brodziak - Cogliano
Grebeshkov - Staios
This is where we will suffer on d-zone faceoffs. Things really drop off below Horc. I see Brodziak stepping up in Nov-Dec and showing us decent faceoff numbers. Brule may slip in on the 2nd unit here as well - if he stays up with the team, that is.
Thursday, August 7, 2008
Okee dokee, here we go!
Allll-righty then! I'm blogging. So (to my enthralled audience of one) lets not disappoint!
So... yeah. Blog. Bloggitty blog-blog-blog. The initial intent is to create another Oilers-based blog, and participate in the online Oilers community, contributing where I can. We're gonna have a great season this year... everyone chipping in... firing on all cylinders... and play with intensity... we had some bad breaks... the next game is a huge game for us... we're ready to take the next step... he stole two points for us tonight... we've got to take it one shift at at time... and give 110%... the next goal is gonna be a big one... it's gutcheck time!
So following the theme of above-inserted awfully-boring (and cliche) hockey quotes, here is a list of oddball, sometimes humorous comments from current and past Oilers. Try and guess who said what:
1. "We're going to do some damage!" - player quoted heading into the '06 playoffs;
2. "Part of the learning curve in Edmonton is learning to hate Calgary";
3. "Every goalie we play against seems to have the game of his life against us" - said Oiler during a particularly awful span of games in '06-'07;
4. "I just tape four Tylenols to it" - former player said about playing on injured ankle;
5. "I don’t like my hockey sticks touching other sticks, and I don’t like them crossing one another, and I kind of have them hidden in the corner. I put baby powder on the ends. I think it’s essentially a matter of taking care of what takes care of you";
6. "When we've got the puck, they can't score";
7. "There are similarities but I think [Bisaillon] is going to be better because he doesn’t turn the puck over as much as ‘Bergy’ sometimes did";
8. "If it’s sexy, let’s be honest, sex sells. I wouldn’t have a problem with that" - player said regarding the new tv show MVP;
9. "I just grabbed her Slurpee and started drinking and then gave it back to her. She was shocked." - former Oiler said about how he met his wife while playing in junior;
10. " You can have all the talent in the world, but if the pumper's not there, it doesn't matter".
Winner gets a bran muffin and 10 Stanley Nickels.
So... yeah. Blog. Bloggitty blog-blog-blog. The initial intent is to create another Oilers-based blog, and participate in the online Oilers community, contributing where I can. We're gonna have a great season this year... everyone chipping in... firing on all cylinders... and play with intensity... we had some bad breaks... the next game is a huge game for us... we're ready to take the next step... he stole two points for us tonight... we've got to take it one shift at at time... and give 110%... the next goal is gonna be a big one... it's gutcheck time!
So following the theme of above-inserted awfully-boring (and cliche) hockey quotes, here is a list of oddball, sometimes humorous comments from current and past Oilers. Try and guess who said what:
1. "We're going to do some damage!" - player quoted heading into the '06 playoffs;
2. "Part of the learning curve in Edmonton is learning to hate Calgary";
3. "Every goalie we play against seems to have the game of his life against us" - said Oiler during a particularly awful span of games in '06-'07;
4. "I just tape four Tylenols to it" - former player said about playing on injured ankle;
5. "I don’t like my hockey sticks touching other sticks, and I don’t like them crossing one another, and I kind of have them hidden in the corner. I put baby powder on the ends. I think it’s essentially a matter of taking care of what takes care of you";
6. "When we've got the puck, they can't score";
7. "There are similarities but I think [Bisaillon] is going to be better because he doesn’t turn the puck over as much as ‘Bergy’ sometimes did";
8. "If it’s sexy, let’s be honest, sex sells. I wouldn’t have a problem with that" - player said regarding the new tv show MVP;
9. "I just grabbed her Slurpee and started drinking and then gave it back to her. She was shocked." - former Oiler said about how he met his wife while playing in junior;
10. " You can have all the talent in the world, but if the pumper's not there, it doesn't matter".
Winner gets a bran muffin and 10 Stanley Nickels.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
